| From:
1994 Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference:
FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON FEEDING HIGHLY PRODUCTIVE SHEEP
D.E. Hogue
Department of Animal Science
Cornell University
At last year's Cornell Nutrition Conference (1), we discussed
some feeding strategies for highly productive sheep. These sheep
are generally
described as those managed to lamb frequently, produce multiple
lambs at each lambing and after weaning the ewes should be capable
of re-breeding
and the lambs growing rapidly. We have concentrated on those performing
well when managed on the STAR system as meeting this description.
Most of the ewes are of moderate size and are of Dorset, Finn or
Finn Dorset breeding and may be bred either to rams of the
same breed to produce replacement females or to large terminal
cross rams to produce rapidly growing market lambs.
We generally divide the STAR managed flock into 3 distinct groups
and consider the nutrition or feeding of each group individually.
These are (1) the breeding and pregnant group, (2) the lambing
and lactating group, and (3) the weaned growing lambs.
The breeding and pregnant group will not have unreasonably high
requirements even if considerable numbers of ewes in the group
are pregnant with
3 or 4 lambs. The lambing and lactating ewes will have the highest
requirements, particularly those suckling multiple lambs. The weaned
growing lamb's requirements can be generally met with most traditional
recommendations. As most pregnant ewes join the lambing group 2
to 6 weeks prior to lambing, increased requirements for late pregnancy
with multiple lambs can be met at that time.
In 1975 (2), the author extended the then NRC (1968) (3) requirements
and estimated some values for ewes pregnant with more than 2 lambs,
ewe lambs bred at 7 months of age, ewes lactating with 3 or 4 lambs
and ewes lambing more frequently than once a year. Since that time,
the latest NRC publication (1985) (4) has expanded estimated requirements
to include pregnancy and lactation for ewe lambs at different lambing
rates and also for ewes pregnant at different expected lambing
rates. No estimates are given for ewes with more than 2 lambs. It is important to recognize that the requirements for ewes published
by NRC should be especially useful because they identify and define
the expected body weight gain or loss of the ewes at each stage
of production. These changes in body weight are set so that the
ewes
end each production year at the same body weight (and presumably
the same body composition or condition score) as at the beginning.
Furthermore, these weight changes are minimized with the ewes only
losing weight during early lactation and theoretically recovering
that loss in late lactation.
It is thereby implied that ewes during early lactation are expected
to lose body weight (and presumably body condition). It is usually
considered that ewes rearing twins cannot consume sufficient nutrients
to prevent weight loss at this time. It was suggested at last year's
conference that changing the feeding strategy for ewes with triplets
to full-feeding a concentrate portion of the diet might be a possible
method of minimizing weight loss in ewes suckled by 2 or more lambs.
Data are presented in Table 1 on observed feed intake and body
weight changes of triplet-rearing ewes and their lambs. In the
first trial,
Finn ´ Dorset ewes weighing 144 lb and rearing triplets were
fed 2.0 lb of average quality hay per day each and allowed ad lib
consumption of a high energy complete lamb pellet (Agway). One
lamb was lost at the end of the 30-day trial and was omitted from
the
data. The trial was started when the ewes were 2 to 3 weeks postpartum.
In this trial, the ewes consumed 6.9 lb of the pellets daily in
addition to the 2 lb of hay for a total consumption of 8.9 lb of
air dry feed
or about 8 lb of dry matter. The lambs also had access to the pellets
in a creep. This compares to the NRC expected dry matter intake
of 6 lb for ewes of this weight rearing twins during early lactation.
Furthermore, although digestibility data are not available, the
available
energy fed in this trial most probably exceeds that anticipated
in the NRC table.
| Table 1. Observed feed intake and body weight
gains of triplet-rearing ewes and their lambs. |
| Trial 1 |
|
|
|
Feed Consumption (Ewes)
|
Daily gain (30 days)
|
Hay
|
2.0 lb
|
Ewes (8)
|
0.29 lb (130 g)
|
Pellets'
|
6.9 lb
|
Lambs (23)
|
0.49 lb (222 g)
|
Total
|
8.9 lb
|
3 Lambs
|
1.47 lb (666 g)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Trial 2 |
|
|
|
Feed Consumption (Ewes)
|
Daily gain (41 days)
|
Hay
|
3.3 lb
|
Ewes (14)
|
0.55 lb (250 g)
|
Pellets'
|
7.6 lb
|
Lambs (42)
|
0.71 lb (322 g)
|
Total
|
10.9 lb
|
3 Lambs
|
2.13 lb (966 g)
|
| 'High Energy Lamb Pellets, Agway Inc., Syracuse,
NY. This diet is similar in composition to that for Cornell
High Energy Lamb Diets. One of the key ingredients to improve
intake is 15 to 20% soy hulls. |
Now look at the gain data in Table 1 on trial 1. The ewes actually
gained 0.29 lb (130 g) per day during the trial and their 3 lambs
averaged 0.49 lb (222 g) per day or a total lamb daily gain of
1.47 lb (666 g). Is it really obligatory that ewes be in negative
energy
balance during early lactation? Apparently not! In a second trial (Table 1), ewes were again limit fed average
quality hay (3.3 lb/day) and fed the pelleted diet ad lib. Fourteen
ewes
rearing 42 lambs were used and continued from 1 to 2 weeks postpartum
for 41 days. In this trial, all lambs were sired by large black-faced
rams. Again, the ewes consumed feed at a great rate eating 3.3
lb of hay and 7.6 lb of pellets daily. This totals 10.9 lb of feed
or
about 9.8 lb of dry matter. The ewe's initial weight averaged 143
lb so this amounts to a dry matter intake of almost 7% of body
weight. The lambs could have consumed some of the hay, but the
ewe pellet
feeder was elevated to prevent lambs from consuming pellets other
than in the creep.
In this trial, the ewes gained 0.55 lb (250 g) per day and the
lambs gained 0.71 lb (322 g/day) for a total lamb daily gain of
2.13 lb
(966 9).
Clearly, it is possible to reach levels of intake and animal
performance far above what we consider "normal" as indicated in many
of our 'requirement" tables. To do this may necessitate changing
our feeding strategies and expectations. Whether or not these levels
of intake and animal performance are economic and should be used
as recommendations remains to be seen. However, it is clear that
we should not be restricted by recommendations or requirements that
are normally in use.
REFERENCES
1. Hogue, D.E. 1993. Feeding strategies for highly productive
sheep. Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf. pp 121-125.
2. Hogue, D.E. 1975. Nutritional requirements of highly productive
sheep. Proc. SID Symposium "Sheep Breeding & Feeding for
Profit" pp. 34-48.
3. NRC. 1968. Nutrient requirements of sheep. 4th edition.
4. NRC. 1985. Nutrient requirements of sheep. 6th edition.
|